All of these guns work well for that being well under the 16-ounce threshold. This is actually an effective way of carrying a firearm, but it is not a quick-access carry method. These guns could also work for other, more niche applications like ankle or boot carry. Most people will carry these either for inside the waistband (IWB) carry (for roles where they can not wear a belt and need a lightweight gun) or in the pocket.
There really isn’t going to be a difference in how they’re carried. Ruger LCP vs LCP II/Lite Concealed CarryĪll of these guns are definitely suited for concealed carry.Īs I said earlier, they’re almost identical in size and weight.
That said, this safety is a very small part of the gun and will not affect concealment for 99 percent of users. This safety style adds a little bit of width. That’s due to a push-style safety on the Lite. The Ruger LCP II Lite is around a tenth of an inch larger than the regular Ruger LCP. Look at that from a percentage standpoint and you’ll see it’s a pretty large difference.Īnother dimension to look at is the width across the controls. While this may not sound like a lot, for some people this will affect concealment. It’s around an eighth of an inch thinner than the other two guns mentioned. The classic LCP’s grip width is much thinner than that of the Ruger LCP II and LCP II Lite.
There are also two other dimensions that are drastically different. The LCP II does have a weight disadvantage to the classic LCP being almost one ounce heavier. 22, so it’s a little bit longer than the flush-fit magazines on the Ruger LCP and LCP II.īoth the LCP and LCP II hold six rounds of. The magazine on the Ruger LCP II Lite holds 10 rounds of. The Ruger LCP II Lite is a little over a quarter of an inch longer than the other two options due to the magazine design. Height (top of slide to bottom of magazine baseplate) (Inches)Īs you can see from our chart, the size of these guns is dang near identical. Ruger LCP vs LCP II/Lite Concealed Carry.
0 kommentar(er)
